I am getting very high HDD usage with 2.3.16. I do not use it, I just leave Logic 2.3.16 idle and it shows hdd transfers of 30 MB/s. This is not normal. CPU usage is also high for an idle application.
It seems this starts when I load a capture from before. Disk usage goes 100% ! This overloads my computer.
I tried 2.3.15 and it happens again. Once I load a capture it halts my computer: mouse does not move, I can not even kill Logic 2 … it is at the point where it will damage my computer …
And which version should I use to avoid this problem? I want to load a capture and compare with an old one. It is currently impossible.
From a first impression, it looks like you have 19 million results, so 5GB might not be that far fetched, however, we’re still looking into this.
Have you noticed by any chance if the progress bar was updating? What OS are you using?
Yes, there are too many values to build in the Simple Parallel. Actually I do not need these millions of values. In reality I need only the first 10 to verify that my card is working.
So you can slow down the processing priority or set a limit to the values processed. The default value can be the first 500 values for example.
Still I am not sure this is the only problem here.
I’m glad that it’s working for you (partially, at least ). One suggestion that might help is using the timer option (or the trim after capture option). This way, you can capture only 0.1 seconds of data for example.
The other problem is when the values are printed in the terminal view in Simple Parallel. This also hijacks the memory and the HDD.
The only way to use your software is to use “Affinity” in Windows and set Logic 2 not to use more than 4 cores out the 8 I have, so that the computer is not overloaded.
Another quick question, which I will experiment and try to answer myself:
In the thread:
There were two User added Analyzers that might help out. I tried one of them which is nice, now I thought I would try the second one (QSPI).
Question is: can I specify multiple paths in the preferences for the Custom Low Level Analyzers?
Example ; separated?
Again I can and will try it and see, but thought I would ask as maybe the hints or like should say one way or another. I am guessing not, as the (i) says: the path…
But thought I would ask anyway…
Update: multiple paths separated by ;'s does not work.
We only support a single location at the moment (sorry…), however, you can add multiple analyzers to that folder and it will load all of them. I hope that it helps