I absolutely agree with you! Personally, it’s frustrating not being able to apply a glitch filter after the capture, and being forced to take a brand new capture (lot of set up involved if everything is not already hooked up properly for another quick capture).
I’ve added another comment in the feature request post below that links back to this forum post so we can keep track of this request.
As a quick note, Mark summarized some of the challenges with implementing an “after-capture” glitch filter. It’s certainly doable, but not something we can prioritize at the moment, given the scope of the project.